MIKE BEGG
Amazon · Beauty & Personal Care · 9 days

How a beauty brand cut TACoS from 21.95% to 14.40% while adding $18.9K in sales

Answer-first

A beauty and personal care brand on Amazon was spending 21.95% of sales on ads. Comparing Sept 22-30 to Oct 1-9, TACoS fell to 14.40% (down 7.55 points, or 34.4%), sales grew from $85.7K to $104.6K, and ad costs dropped from $18.8K to $15.1K. That is roughly $3.75K less ad spend and $18.86K more in sales.

TACoS
21.95% → 14.40%
Sales, 9-day windows
$85.7K → $104.6K
Ad spend
-$3.75K
Published ·Updated
TACoS
21.95% → 14.40%
Sales
$85.7K → $104.6K
Advertising cost
$18.8K → $15.1K
Window compared
9 days

01The challenge

A beauty and personal care brand was putting 21.95% of its sales into advertising. Between Sept 22 and Sept 30 the account did $85.7K in sales on $18.8K of ad cost.

That is a lot of ad dollars chasing traffic that was not all earning its keep: irrelevant search terms, bids that kept CPC higher than it needed to be, and budget parked on campaigns running high ACOS.

When TACoS is high, the fix is rarely more sales on the same spend. It is usually less waste inside the spend.

02The approach: The Waste-Out Reallocation

The Waste-Out Reallocation is a cleanup-first sequence. Take the waste out, then move the freed budget to what converts.

  1. Take the waste out

    Added negative keywords to cut irrelevant traffic, and paused the campaigns running high ACOS so they stopped drawing budget.

  2. Lower the cost of every click

    Optimized bids to bring CPC down and restructured campaigns for tighter targeting, so the same traffic cost less to buy.

  3. Reallocate to what converts

    Moved the freed budget to the campaigns that were converting well, so the money that left the weak campaigns went to work in the strong ones.

03The results

Comparing Oct 1-9 with Sept 22-30, TACoS improved from 21.95% to 14.40%, a drop of 7.55 percentage points (34.4%). Sales moved from $85.7K to $104.6K while advertising cost fell from $18.8K to $15.1K.

In dollar terms that is about $3.75K less spent on advertising alongside $18.86K more in sales. These are two separate 9-day windows compared against each other, not a day-by-day trend.

Why it worked: the account did not need more spend, it needed less waste in the spend it already had. Cutting irrelevant traffic and high-ACOS campaigns first, then reallocating, is what let sales rise while the ad bill fell.


04FAQ

How do you lower TACoS on Amazon without losing sales?

Remove waste before you reallocate. On this beauty and personal care account, negative keywords, bid optimization, campaign restructuring and pausing high-ACOS campaigns took TACoS from 21.95% to 14.40% while sales grew from $85.7K to $104.6K across two 9-day windows.

What is the Waste-Out Reallocation?

A three-step sequence: (1) cut waste with negative keywords and by pausing high-ACOS campaigns; (2) lower click cost with bid optimization and tighter campaign structure; (3) move the freed budget to campaigns that already convert.

What is TACoS and why does it matter?

TACoS is total advertising cost of sales: ad spend divided by total sales, not just ad-attributed sales. It shows how much of your whole revenue the ads are costing you, so a falling TACoS with rising sales means growth is getting cheaper.

Is this a trend or a before and after?

A before and after. The result compares two separate 9-day windows, Sept 22-30 and Oct 1-9. It does not show a daily progression inside either window.

Get the playbook

One operator case study a week, in your inbox.

The framework, the numbers, the why-it-worked. No fluff. Same voice as this page.

SubscribeWork With Me
Mike Begg, e-commerce operator and business acquirer

Mike Begg

E-commerce operator and business acquirer. Founder of AMZ Commerce Advisers (100+ active Amazon brands, 500+ managed since 2016) and GoAvance. Owner of Reach Social Commerce (50+ TikTok Shop launches). Amazon Ads Advanced Partner. Based in Guadalajara, Mexico.

Featured on BiggerPockets, Millionaire Interviews, Practical Ecommerce, and more about Mike Begg →